- #Lotus notes mac client buggy bugs cracked#
- #Lotus notes mac client buggy bugs mac os x#
- #Lotus notes mac client buggy bugs mac os#
- #Lotus notes mac client buggy bugs install#
- #Lotus notes mac client buggy bugs windows 10#
My surface was basically unusable for a few weeks until MS fixed the networking issues, and that's their own hardware. IMO, Google should be the concerned one, especially inspite of being just a mobile OS.
#Lotus notes mac client buggy bugs windows 10#
WTH are you talking about ? Windows 10 had a darn smooth rollout with 110mn in few weeks! It's just as likely most users saw iWork already on the machine and didn't bother using anything else.Īnyone else find it amusing that the OS release (El Capitan) that was supposed to deploy stablitiy fixes over the past few OS releases was flawed / buggy and unstable and requires more stability fixes ?Īmazing how after 40+ years of OS development Apple (and Microsoft) cannot release a oneshot OS cleanly the first time out. MS Office could be on most machines, but IBM didn't make that data available. This means Numbers, Pages, and Keynote are the default preinstalled productivity applications on each Mac IBM deploys. JAMF Self Service is installed automatically and then the user picks which software to install. That means the machine end up in the users hands shrink wrapped. On top of that, the method IBM uses for deployment doesn't rely on standardized imaging, but rather DEP.
#Lotus notes mac client buggy bugs install#
Office is made available through the JSS via Self Service, but it is not deployed automatically and requires the employee to install it. Saying "most" get office has no actual evidence to go along with it. In an example given by Previn, the employee simply needs to click install for Microsoft Office, and IT will handle the licensing on the backend without exposing any of it to the user. JAMF Software's Self Service allows IBM and its employees a simple method for installing licensed software. I'm not sure why you're being so aggressively downvoted for this comment. why would anyone lie about the products they sell. Nah they wouldn't make something like that up. Gee I wonder if that has anything to do with IBM being the new Apple vendor in the enterprise space. Lower Mac TCO vs Windows existed before osx and its unix underpinnings.
Back in the day when I had a bunch of servers, the UNIX boxes would routinely have up times measured in months or hundreds of days.
#Lotus notes mac client buggy bugs mac os#
Which IMO has everything to do with Mac OS being based on UNIX. This isn't really news, this is something Mac users have known for a long time. According to IBM, moving to Macs despite the upfront cost will save them money due to the lower IT support costs. According to IBM, PC users require 8 times as much IT support on average. The most interesting part of that roll out is their report on the support costs.
#Lotus notes mac client buggy bugs cracked#
(Unless you count cracked versions of Office 2007 on XP) Likewise, people that use Windows for personal use have a fairly low percentage of Office. If you split those users into groups, personal/home, creative business, and non-creative business, you will find that that last group has a fairly high percentage of Office use. The thread is also at least partially about MS Office 2016. They have their own suite of products which are free, why pay for Office unless it's absolutely necessary? In fact I would imagine they'd want people not to choose MS Office if at all possible - fewer MS Office installs means less money paid to MS. Not saying it's wrong that most are getting MS Office, but I've not read anything that talks about that particular point yet in this story. It's true that they allow people to install Office (it's been that way since the PwCC acquisition if my memory serves me well), but I'm pretty certain not everyone would choose Office and I'm not even sure they have licenses to cover everyone in the company, especially since they have their own tools which they've ported to the Mac (Lotus Notes). The article you quote doesn't state anything about numbers regarding MS Office installed on the new Macs, I'm curious about this. IBM is rolling out 1,900 Macs a week and most of those get MS Office. Mail.app is a capable, but not great, mail client.
#Lotus notes mac client buggy bugs mac os x#
You realize that you're posting to an OS X thread right? The proportion of Outlook users on Mac OS X is much lower than on windows. Nearly everyone on my family and my friends circle uses outlook mail client. It is more optimized than Yosemite, and the only problem with Office 2016 was Outlook, which most people do not use. El Capitan, even 10.11, was better than any version of Yosemite. No, because all software has some issues that need to be ironed out.